You are viewing chaoticidealism

No More Chocolate

For some time I've felt lucky to be autistic in part because it means that my compassion does not depend on my ability to see the face of a suffering person, know his identity, or feel any sort of connection with him. Just knowing someone is suffering causes me to want to fix whatever's causing it. The earthquakes in Haiti and Japan, the Africa tsunami, the civil war in Libya, and many smaller disasters, always made me want to help. But I can't; they're too far away and I have very little money to send.

Turns out I may not be as lucky as I thought I was. Like many human beings, I find it easier to ignore human suffering when it's not obvious, when it's on the other side of a wall I can't see through. I may not need to see someone's face, but if I'm not reminded that they are in pain, I may simply forget about them.

From the title of this post, you already know I'm talking about chocolate. Agricultural workers growing chocolate are poorly paid or unpaid, exposed to dangerous chemicals without protective gear, working as much as a hundred hours a week. Many are essentially slaves, having been lured with the promise of working and sending money home to their families, only to be held against their will, unable to return home. Many are beaten.

Oh, and did I mention?... Often times, these workers aren't adults. They're kids. A majority of these kids are younger than fourteen. They get very little education, and they're doing jobs that are meant for adults--carrying too much weight, using dangerous tools like machetes.

I've known about this for most of a year, I think; maybe a little less. And for most of that year, I've been eating chocolate.

Maybe it's because I haven't been constantly reminded of it, the way I would be if a natural disaster were in the news. Or maybe it's just because I don't have the willpower to resist a chocolate craving. Either way, I'm ashamed of myself. It needs to change. So... I won't be buying any more chocolate.

I know it won't do much. I'm under no illusion that my refusal to buy a Hershey's bar at the checkout is going to do much for a ten-year-old hauling cocoa beans in Africa. But maybe that is exactly why child slavery in chocolate production still exists--because everybody knows that getting rid of their little part in the problem isn't going to change much. The farmers know that their employees (or "employees", more correctly) will just end up working for someone else; anyway, the farmers weren't the ones who kidnapped anyone. Families send children to work because they can't eat otherwise. The companies buying chocolate reason that they aren't the ones employing child labor; and anyway, if they don't buy the inexpensive cocoa on the market, someone else will. And here in the US, most people don't even know it's going on. The lawmakers have been trying to change things for more than a decade, but each deadline keeps getting pushed back and nothing gets done.

There's "fair trade" chocolate out there; it's more expensive, and less likely to have been produced using child labor or slaves. It's hard to find, though, and expensive. All the major companies are still buying cocoa from the same places, because if they don't, all the other major companies will be able to undersell them. Other problematic foodstuffs aren't so complicated. You can find fair trade coffee pretty easily, and organic bananas are usually produced more ethically (and anyway can be replaced with apples or pears when you want fruit); but I haven't been able to find, or afford, ethically produced chocolate.

So why am I even doing this? I guess it's because if something like this is going on, I don't want to be involved in it. If I can't change it, at least I don't have to be part of the problem.

You are probably thinking to yourself, "Boy, she's self-righteous, going on publicly about how she's not going to be involved in slavery." Yeah. I'm thinking that to myself, too. Maybe it's true. But the fact is, I like chocolate. I like it a lot. And I think that if I make a commitment publicly, I'll be less likely to break it. I'll have all of you looking over my shoulder--perhaps literally, considering that some of the people who read my blog are people I know in everyday life. Plus, maybe some of you didn't know about the problem. If you didn't, inform yourself, and listen to your conscience. I can't tell you what to do about it; like I said, I've been eating chocolate, too. It's an awfully tempting substance.

Maybe, sooner or later, things will change and chocolate will be something grown by adult workers, free to leave, working in safety, and fairly paid. When that happens, chocolate prices may go up, but it will be all the sweeter because we'll be able to eat it without wondering whether someone suffered to produce it.

Comments

I get it. I no longer buy chocolate anything if I don't know where it comes from.

Furthermore, I only buy chocolate from Equal Exchange. They are for supporting small farming businesses in other countries and DO NOT BUY chocolate from farms that use child slaves. To learn more, go here. Yeah, they're more expensive but you're buying non-child slave chocolate and they taste AWESOME. :)

I don't think you're self-righteous

I don't think you're self-righteous at all. I think it's good that you have the fortitude to do this.

I don't buy my own food --- my mom buys food for our whole household. My dad doesn't like chocolate, but my mom and I really do. Maybe I will talk to her about this, and propose that we stop buying all non-fair-trade chocolate, which would mean we would have a lot less chocolate a lot less often.

Another ethical-eating priority for me, that will have to wait until I am on my own, is giving up meat.

*AND* I just read something hugely disturbing (http://feministninja.tumblr.com/post/41228848649/the-pharmacologists-who-developed-hormone) about how the estrogen in hormone-replacement therapy is produced, and I remembered that my birth control pills have estrogen in them. I wanted very much not to be a part of THAT, but I also do not want ever to be pregnant. I was already planning to get surgically sterilized, so I guess that's just one more reason to do it as soon as I can.

Anyway, good for you. Our whole social and economic system is so saturated with slavery and cruelty, I think everyone who can opt out of any part of it is doing a good thing.
Your desire to help is commendable; but consider whether you are making things better or worse.
If you are talking about honest-to-God actual slavery, then yes, refusing to buy products is the right thing to do: but if it is a case of workers employed in appalling conditions because they have no better option, then eliminating their best option is not progress.
Progress occurs when they have more options - which requires starting capital - which requires some sort of work. The supply of cheap labour is not unlimited; once met, companies must increase wages to stop their workers jumping to slightly better jobs. Workers in the copper mines in West Irian Jaya recently had their pay multiply by a factor of 10 because the need to expand operations allowed them to demand the pay rise.
We had similar conditions in the Western world a few centuries ago: we can pull the rest of the world out of squalor by copying the path our ancestors trod.
Yes, honest-to-God slavery. As in, beaten and locked up at night so they can't run away, kidnapped from another country slavery. And it's the Western appetite for chocolate that's letting it happen. I'm not doing this because I think I can make a difference. I'm under no illusions here. I just don't want to be involved in human rights abuses.

Supporting companies selling fair trade chocolate would probably do some good; that way there would be more profit in hiring workers, paying them decently, and treating them well.
same with bananas and other agricultural stuff. do you getaccess to far trade stuff?
Some. Only if they're so widely available that you can find them at a grocery store.